当前位置:首页 / 3D打印术前规划辅助髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗先天性髋关节脱位的临床效果
论著·临床研究 | 更新时间:2026-01-05
|
3D打印术前规划辅助髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗先天性髋关节脱位的临床效果
Clinical effect of 3D⁃printing preoperative planning⁃assisted hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy for the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip

广西医学 页码:1739-1744

作者机构:鲍呈元,本科,主任医师,研究方向为骨折临床相关研究。

基金信息:青海省卫生健康系统指导性计划课题(2024⁃wjzdx⁃59)

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253⁃4304.2025.12.06

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨3D打印术前规划辅助髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗先天性髋关节脱位(CDH)的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析139例(154个髋关节脱位)CDH患儿的临床资料,根据治疗方法分为对照组(70例,采用髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗)和观察组(69例,采用3D打印术前规划辅助髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗)。比较两组患儿的手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数及术后住院时间)、临床疗效及术后相关并发症发生情况,以及手术前后的影像学指标[髋臼指数(AI)、中心边缘角(CE)、臼顶倾斜角(AC)、股骨颈前倾角、髋臼覆盖率]、髋关节功能(Harris评分)。结果 观察组患儿的手术时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量及术中透视次数短于或少于对照组(P<0.05)。术后,两组患儿的AI、AC、股骨颈前倾角较术前降低,CE、髋臼覆盖率较术前升高,观察组患儿的CE、AC大于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1年,两组患儿的Harris评分较术前升高,且观察组患儿的Harris评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的总有效率为95.65%,高于对照组的84.29%(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的并发症总发生率为4.35%,低于对照组的14.29%(P<0.05)。结论 与髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术相比,采用3D打印术前规划辅助髋关节切开复位骨盆股骨截骨术治疗CDH可缩短手术时间及术后住院时间,减少术中出血量及透视次数,患儿术后髋关节功能恢复更快,临床疗效更好,且安全性较高。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of 3D⁃printing preoperative planning⁃assisted hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy for the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH). Methods Clinical data of 139 CDH children (154 hip dislocations) were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the treatment method, children were divided into control group (70 cases, treated with hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy) or observation group (69 cases, treated with 3D⁃printing preoperative planning⁃assisted hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy). The surgical⁃related indicators (operation duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and postoperative length of hospital stay), clinical efficacy, the occurrence of postoperative relevant complications, as well as preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters with respect to acetabular index (AI), center⁃edge angle (CE), acetabular cup inclination angle (AC), femoral neck anteversion angle, acetabular coverage rate, and hip function (Harris score) were compared between the two groups. Results The operation duration, postoperative length of hospital stay, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in the observation group were shorter or less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Postoperatively, the AI, AC, and femoral neck anteversion angle in both groups decreased compared to preoperative values, while the CE and acetabular coverage rate increased; in addition, the postoperative CE and AC in the observation group were greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). At 1 year postoperatively, the Harris scores in both groups increased compared to preoperative scores, and the Harris score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 95.65%, higher than the 84.29% in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 4.35%, lower than the 14.29% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy, the 3D⁃printing preoperative planning⁃assisted hip arthrotomy reduction with pelvic and femoral osteotomy for CDH can shorten operation duration and postoperative length of hospital stay, reduce intraoperative bleeding volume and fluoroscopy frequency, promote faster postoperative hip function recovery, yield better clinical efficacy, and demonstrate higher safety.

59

浏览量

45

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集