当前位置:首页 / 频发性房性早搏对犬心房颤动易感性、心脏重构的影响
论著·基础研究 | 更新时间:2026-08-10
|
频发性房性早搏对犬心房颤动易感性、心脏重构的影响
Effects of frequent premature atrial contraction on atrial fibrillation susceptibility and cardiac remodeling in dogs

广西医学 页码:1033-1044

作者机构:王槐,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为心血管疾病相关机制。

基金信息:广西自然科学基金(2019GXNSFAA245099)

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253⁃4304.2026.07.14

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨频发性房性早搏(PAC)对犬心房颤动(以下简称房颤)易感性、心脏重构的影响。方法 将6只比格犬随机分为PAC组(n=3)和对照组(n=3),通过开胸手术在左心耳植入双腔起搏器以建立频发性PAC犬模型。在术中植入双腔起搏器前检测两组犬的血常规指标及血清C⁃反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素6 (IL⁃6)水平,采用心电图测量P波时程和P波振幅,并行经胸超声心动图检查。双腔起搏器植入1周后记录起搏器基线参数,检测两组犬的血常规指标及血清CRP、IL⁃6水平。双腔起搏器植入后第3个月、6个月对两组犬进行心电图和经胸超声心动图检查,并记录双腔起搏器参数。双腔起搏器植入后第6个月采用电生理检查获取两组犬的心房基质图和评估房颤易感性。双腔起搏器植入后第6个月,收集左心房、左心耳、左肺静脉和右肺静脉样本用于Masson染色以评估犬心肌纤维化程度,通过ELISA检测两组犬的外周血中脑钠肽(BNP)、转化生长因子β1(TGF⁃β1)和Ⅲ型胶原蛋白α1链(COL3A1)蛋白表达水平,通过Western blot检测两组犬的左心房心肌组织TGF⁃β1、α⁃平滑肌肌动蛋白(α⁃SMA)、COL3A1蛋白表达水平。 结果 双腔起搏器植入前和植入后1周,两组犬的血常规指标、CRP和IL⁃6水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且两组植入后1周的上述指标与植入前相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。双腔起搏器植入后第3个月,两组犬的P波振幅和P波时程差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);植入后第6个月,PAC组犬的P波时程长于对照组(P<0.05),但两组犬的P波振幅差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。双腔起搏器植入后第3个月,PAC组犬的左心房收缩末期容积大于对照组(P<0.05);植入后第6个月,PAC组犬的左心房收缩末期容积、左心房面积、E/A值、肺动脉压大于或高于对照组,左心房射血分数低于对照组(P<0.05)。PAC组犬在双腔起搏器植入后第3个月的PAC成功起搏率为95.6%~99.9%,植入后第6个月时为96.7%~100.0%。PAC组犬在冠状窦口、高位右心房、低位右心房的房颤持续时间长于对照组,在上述部位进行刺激时房颤诱发成功率高于对照组(P<0.05)。心房基质图显示,PAC组犬的低电压区域较对照组增加。PAC组犬的左心房、左心耳、左肺静脉和右肺静脉的纤维化比例高于对照组(P<0.05)。PAC组犬外周血的TGF⁃β1和 COL3A1表达水平高于对照组(P<0.05),但两组犬外周血的BNP表达水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与对照组比较,PAC组犬的左心房心肌组织中TGF⁃β1、α⁃SMA、COL3A1蛋白表达水平升高(P<0.05)。结论 在左心耳植入双腔起搏器可建立稳定的PAC犬模型,频发性PAC会增加房颤的易感性,导致心房和心室的重构及功能下降。

Objective To investigate the effects of frequent premature atrial contraction (PAC) on atrial fibrillation susceptibility and cardiac remodeling in dogs. Methods Six beagle dogs were randomly divided into PAC group (n=3) or control group (n=3). A canine model of frequent PAC was established by implanting a dual⁃chamber pacemaker in the left atrial appendage through open‑chest surgery. Before intraoperative implantation of the dual‑chamber pacemaker, routine blood parameters, serum C‑reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL‑6) levels were measured in both groups. P‑wave duration and P‑wave amplitude were assessed by electrocardiography, and transthoracic echocardiography was performed. One week after dual⁃chamber pacemaker implantation, baseline pacemaker parameters were recorded, and routine blood parameters, and serum CRP and IL‑6 levels were measured in both groups. At 3 and 6 months post‑implantation, electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography were performed in both groups, and dual⁃chamber pacemaker parameters were documented. At 6 months post‑implantation, electrophysiological examinations were conducted to obtain atrial substrate maps and evaluate atrial fibrillation susceptibility. At the same time point, samples from the left atrium, left atrial appendage, left pulmonary veins, and right pulmonary veins were collected for Masson's staining to assess myocardial fibrosis in dogs. Peripheral blood expressions of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), transforming growth factor β1 (TGF‑β1), and collagen type Ⅲ alpha 1 chain (COL3A1) protein were measured by ELISA. Protein expressions of TGF‑β1, α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA), and COL3A1 in left atrial myocardial tissues were determined by Western blot. Results Before and at 1 week after dual⁃chamber pacemaker implantation, there was no statistically significant difference in routine blood parameters, CRP or IL‑6 levels between the two groups (P>0.05), and these parameters at 1 week post‑implantation did not differ significantly from pre‑implantation values within either group (P>0.05). At 3 months post‑implantation, there was no statistically significant difference in P‑wave amplitude or P‑wave duration between the two groups (P>0.05). At 6 months post‑implantation, the PAC group exhibited a longer P‑wave duration than the control group (P<0.05), but P‑wave amplitude did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months post‑implantation, the left atrial end‑systolic volume was greater in the PAC group than in the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months post‑implantation, the PAC group interpreted greater left atrial end‑systolic volume, left atrial area, and higher E/A ratio, pulmonary artery pressure, as well as a lower left atrial ejection fraction compared with the control group (P<0.05). The successful PAC pacing rate in the PAC group ranged from 95.6% to 99.9% at 3 months and from 96.7% to 100.0% at 6 months post‑implantation. The duration of atrial fibrillation induced by stimulation at the coronary sinus, high right atrium, low right atrium was longer in the PAC group than in the control group, and the atrial fibrillation induction success rate at these sites was higher in the PAC group than in the control group (P<0.05). Atrial substrate mapping revealed increased low‑voltage areas in the PAC group compared with the control group. The fibrotic proportion in the left atrium, left atrial appendage, left pulmonary veins, and right pulmonary veins was higher in the PAC group than in the control group (P<0.05). Peripheral blood expressions of TGF‑β1 and COL3A1 were higher in the PAC group than in the control group (P<0.05), whereas BNP expressions indicated no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the PAC group exhibited elevated protein expressions of TGF‑β1, α‑SMA, and COL3A1 in left atrial myocardial tissues (P<0.05). Conclusion Stable PAC canine model can be established by implanting a dual‑chamber pacemaker in the left atrial appendage. Frequent PAC increases susceptibility to atrial fibrillation and leads to atrial and ventricular remodeling as well as functional deterioration.

12

浏览量

0

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集