当前位置:首页 / 我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率分析——基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist指数的研究
重点选题“医院管理”·专题专栏 | 更新时间:2026-08-10
|
我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率分析——基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist指数的研究
Analysis of allocation efficiency of human resources for primary⁃level medical and health care in China: a study based on three⁃stage DEA and Malmquist index

广西医学 页码:957-964

作者机构:蓝兰,本科,中级经济师,研究方向为卫生管理研究。

基金信息:广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制研究立项课题(GXJKKJ24Z002)

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253⁃4304.2026.07.04

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 分析我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率及其影响因素,为强化基层医疗卫生服务能力提供对策建议。方法 选取基层卫生技术人员数、乡村医生和卫生员数作为投入指标,诊疗人次、入院人次和家庭卫生服务人次作为产出指标,人均GDP、人口密度、总抚养比和政府卫生支出作为环境变量,运用三阶段数据包络分析模型从静态角度评估2022年我国31个省(自治区、直辖市)基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率的特征,采用Malmquist指数从动态角度分析2013—2022年我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率的变化。结果 (1)2022年,我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置综合效率均值为0.779,11个省(自治区、直辖市)处于技术有效状态(综合效率值为1.000),其余20个省(自治区、直辖市)处于技术无效状态,其中黑龙江省的综合效率值最低(0.356);剔除外部环境及随机干扰的影响后,综合效率均值下降为0.713,此时仅8个省(自治区、直辖市)仍处于技术有效状态,而处于技术无效状态的省(自治区、直辖市)增至23个,其中青海省的综合效率值最低(0.314)。(2)环境变量可影响资源配置效率,其中总抚养比对资源配置效率提升具有显著的积极作用(P<0.05)。(3)2013—2022年基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率的全要素生产率增长缓慢,均值为1.018。结论 我国基层医疗卫生人力资源配置效率有待提升,其省际差异明显且受总抚养比的负向影响显著。建议以实施医疗卫生强基工程为契机,通过优化人才结构、加大财政投入、建设紧密型医联体等途径,系统提升基层医疗卫生人力资源效率与服务能力。

Objective To analyze the allocation efficiency of human resources for primary⁃level medical and health care in China and its influencing factors, providing countermeasure suggestions for strengthening the capacity of primary⁃level medical and health service. Methods The number of grassroots health technicians, the number of village doctors and health workers were selected as input indicators, and the person⁃time of outpatient visits, hospital admissions and family health service visits as output indicators. The per capita GDP, population density, total dependency ratio and government health expenditure were taken as environmental variables. Using the three⁃stage data envelopment analysis model, the characteristics of the efficiency of human resource allocation for primary⁃level medical and health care in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) of China in 2022 were evaluated from a static perspective. The Malmquist index was used to analyze the changes in the allocation efficiency of human resources for primary⁃level medical and health care in China from 2013 to 2022 from a dynamic perspective. Results (1) In 2022, the mean comprehensive efficiency value of primary⁃level medical and health care human resource allocation in China was 0.779. Eleven provinces (autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the central government) were technically efficient (with comprehensive efficiency value of 1), while the remaining 20 were technically inefficient, with Heilongjiang Province recording the lowest comprehensive efficiency value (0.356). After excluding the effects of external environmental factors and random disturbances, the mean comprehensive efficiency value decreased to 0.713. At this point, only eight provinces (autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the central government) remained technically efficient, whereas the number of technically inefficient ones increased to 23, with Qinghai Province having the lowest comprehensive efficiency value (0.314). (2) Environmental variables could affect the efficiency of resource allocation. Among them, the total dependency ratio had a significant positive effect on the improvement of resource allocation efficiency (P<0.05). (3) From 2013 to 2022, the total factor productivity growth of the allocation efficiency of primary⁃level medical and health care human resources was slow, with an average value of 1.018. Conclusion The efficiency of primary⁃level medical and health care human resource allocation in China requires further improvement, with significant inter⁃provincial disparities and a notable negative influence from the total dependency ratio. It is recommended that the implementation of the Healthcare Strengthening at the Grassroots Project serve as an opportunity to systematically enhance the efficiency and service capacity of primary⁃level medical and health care human resources through measures such as optimizing the talent structure, increasing fiscal investment, and building close⁃knit medical alliances. 

10

浏览量

0

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集