当前位置:首页 / 超声骨刀辅助单侧双通道内镜技术治疗老年重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床疗效
| 更新时间:2026-07-13
|
超声骨刀辅助单侧双通道内镜技术治疗老年重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床疗效
Clinical efficacy of ultrasonic osteotome⁃assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy for the treatment of elderly patients with severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

广西医学 页码:776-783

作者机构:郭函,硕士,主治医师,研究方向为脊柱外科。

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253⁃4304.2026.06.02

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨超声骨刀辅助单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)治疗老年重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)患者的临床疗效及技术优势。方法 回顾性分析采用UBE治疗的86例老年重度DLSS患者的临床及影像学资料,根据是否使用超声骨刀辅助骨性减压操作分为观察组(使用超声骨刀,41例)和对照组(使用传统器械,45例)。记录两组患者的手术时间、术中估计出血量(IEBL)、术后引流量、术后住院时间及手术并发症情况。测量手术前后硬膜囊横截面积(DSCA)、术后双侧骨性侧隐窝减压率及入路侧关节突关节切除角(β角)。比较两组患者术前、术后1个月、术后3个月和末次随访时的腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。末次随访时采用改良MacNab标准评估两组患者的临床疗效。结果 所有患者均顺利完成手术。观察组手术时间、IEBL、术后引流量及术后住院时间短于或少于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后各时间点的腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI较术前降低,且术后1个月、术后3个月的腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI逐渐降低(P<0.05);术后各时间点,观察组的腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后DSCA较术前增大,且观察组DSCA大于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者入路侧骨性侧隐窝减压率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组对侧骨性侧隐窝减压率大于对照组,且β角小于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组手术并发症总发生率为2.44%(1/41),对照组为13.33%(6/45)。末次随访时,观察组、对照组的改良MacNab标准优良率分别为95.12%、84.44%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超声骨刀辅助UBE治疗老年重度DLSS患者的临床疗效和影像学结果优于传统手术器械,可缩短手术时间,减少出血量并降低手术并发症发生率。

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and technical advantages of ultrasonic osteotome⁃assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for the treatment of severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in the elderly. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of 86 elderly patients with severe DLSS receiving UBE treatment. Patients were assigned to observation group (employing ultrasonic osteotome, 41 cases) or control group (employing traditional instruments, 45 cases) according to the presence of ultrasonic osteotome⁃assisted bony decompression operation used. Operation duration, intraoperative estimated blood loss (IEBL), postoperative drainage volume, postoperative length of hospital stay, and operative complications of the two groups were recorded. The dural sac cross⁃sectional area (DSCA) before and after surgery, the decompression rate of bilateral bony lateral recess after surgery and the resection angle (β angle) of the facet joint on the approach side were measured. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for low back and legs pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of the two groups were compared before surgery, 1 and 3 months after surgery and at the last follow⁃up. The modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups at the last follow⁃up. Results All patients successfully completed the surgery. Operation duration, IEBL, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative length of hospital stay in the observation group were shorter or less than those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS score for low back and legs pain and ODI of both groups decreased at various time points after surgery as compared with before surgery, and further decreased gradually at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). The observation group exhibited lower VAS score for low back and legs pain and ODI as compared with the control group (P<0.05). DSCA of both groups was increased after surgery compared with before surgery, and the observation group was greater than the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the decompression rate of bony lateral recess on the approach side between the two groups (P>0.05), but the decompression rate of the contralateral bony lateral recess in the observation group was greater than that in the control group, and the β angle was smaller than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 2.44% (1/41), comparing to 13.33% (6/45) in the control group. At the last follow⁃up, the modified MacNab criteria excellent and good rates of both groups were 95.12% and 84.44%, respectively, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of ultrasonic osteotome⁃assisted UBE are superior to those of traditional surgical instruments in the treatment of severe DLSS in the elderly, with shorter operation duration, less bleeding volume, and lower incidence rate of operative complications.

24

浏览量

2

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集